I saw a drowning child yesterday. I was taking my morning run and as I passed the pond on my route I saw a child slip in and fall into the pond. A little bit further away I saw ten children slip and fall into the next pond over. I carefully measured out the distance to each of the two ponds and found that the pond with a single drowning child was slightly closer to me. Therefore I had no ethical obligation to the ten children further away. I waded in and saved the single child closer to me and together we stood on the bank and watched the ten children drown.
Discussion
Here's the full philosophical argument from Peter Singer:
https://www.thelifeyoucansave.org/child-in-the-pond/
And an article from Richard Hanania arguing why is beneficial to intervene in this instance:
https://www.richardhanania.com/p/the-right-way-to-do-regime-change