I saw a drowning child yesterday. I was taking my morning run and as I passed the pond on my route I saw a child slip in and fall into the pond. A little bit further away I saw ten children slip and fall into the next pond over. I carefully measured out the distance to each of the two ponds and found that the pond with a single drowning child was slightly closer to me. Therefore I had no ethical obligation to the ten children further away. I waded in and saved the single child closer to me and together we stood on the bank and watched the ten children drown.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqxh7p36w84mcf6af8f0rlf255mhtqxfg6ynnnt5t5jpj0p5q3cmdqqstepr9a30lcvnt90sns4a3ya6mme9nr22dccd2nq9kkp9je338jts7rwyyq

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Here's the full philosophical argument from Peter Singer:

https://www.thelifeyoucansave.org/child-in-the-pond/

And an article from Richard Hanania arguing why is beneficial to intervene in this instance:

https://www.richardhanania.com/p/the-right-way-to-do-regime-change