When chemical companies receive protections or subsidies from the government, they may feel less pressure to adhere to environmental regulations or to invest in safer practices. This can create a situation where the public bears the consequences of pollution and environmental degradation, while the companies face minimal repercussions.
Discussion
Very true. How come you’re against the US government funding the war in Ukraine but not so much for Israel/Gaza conflict?
Not subsidizing chemical companies is only the first step. It is not enough. It is necessary to abolish state regulation of the chemical industry. Including in terms of environmental restrictions. Courts and insurance companies will protect people more effectively than officials. The best thing you can do for people is to eliminate your position, eliminate all government control bodies and abolish laws regulating the economy. Do not impose your ideas on people under the guise of state coercion. People will sort out their own lives. You just need to not interfere with them. Give people freedom.