Replying to Avatar GrapheneOS

nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyr8ytksx4npuqqwaunuahrd0jg8xyaxcl2dsu6jc5yn006wxfrdp7uvh3j0 nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyqkxs8sjntj93fv6n7qn5ynezedesrplp3ygkjng5xl0w0g9jm7akt7uymw See https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private including the linked third party sources from Divested Computing, Mike Kuketz and others.

/e/ and Fairphone have atrocious security. They provide far weak protection against commercial exploit tools than iPhones. It entirely fits with what the French government wants. They either want devices to have poor security where they can break into them very easily or to provide backdoors in the encryption and for remote/physical device access.

nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyr8ytksx4npuqqwaunuahrd0jg8xyaxcl2dsu6jc5yn006wxfrdp7uvh3j0 nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyqkxs8sjntj93fv6n7qn5ynezedesrplp3ygkjng5xl0w0g9jm7akt7uymw France won't tolerate devices with a reasonable level of security where they can't use widely available off-the-shelf tools to extract data from them. GrapheneOS has massive privacy and security improvements planned.

France's law enforcement sent out memos to all their police telling them to suspect Pixel phones and to give those special treatment due to GrapheneOS existing. Most of what they're talking about is clearly not even GrapheneOS but closed source forks...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Is graphene os any more resistant to having the passcode cracked vs iphones?