I agree with this approach.
Don't look at church and the people in it and analyze backwards.
If true meanings are indeed lost in translations, then it's time to look at the original and study them and try to understand.
I agree with this approach.
Don't look at church and the people in it and analyze backwards.
If true meanings are indeed lost in translations, then it's time to look at the original and study them and try to understand.
For sure. I think most of the religious world is as upside down as economics & diet & healthcare & so many other things are today. But that doesn't make me hate religion or hate economics. Despite regularly being told that I'm not, I actually consider myself a Christian.
Haha I see.
I would say I don't like religion. But I like seeking truth.
Some names for you to remember: Catholic contributions to science.
Pope Sylvester II ( the first in Europe to introduce the decimal numeral system using the Hindu-Arabic numeral system. He is credited with the invention of the first mechanical clock in 996), Nicolaus Copernicus, Gregor Mendel, Georges Lemaître, Albertus Magnus, Roger Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Roger Joseph Boscovich, Marin Mersenne, Bernard Bolzano, Francesco Maria Grimaldi, Nicole Oresme, Jean Buridan, Robert Grosseteste, Christopher Clavius, Nicolas Steno, Athanasius Kircher, Giovanni Battista Riccioli, William of Ockham, and others.
“Seek and you shall find” 🫡
Matthew 7:7-8
Yep, it’s very similar to those other categories.
Checkout “Orthodoxy” by GK Chesterton.
For me it’s been rabbit hole, except the work required to go deeper down is exponentially greater than any other topic. Because a large aspect can’t be intellectualized.
You can read about jujitsu your entire life but until you practice it you’ll never actually understand it. Same with Christianity.
Gods speed brother