I would assume that in most cases the injuries by gun shots would be worse.
Number of shots? You tell me, I'm no gun expert. 6 at least? He suprised everyone.
I would assume that in most cases the injuries by gun shots would be worse.
Number of shots? You tell me, I'm no gun expert. 6 at least? He suprised everyone.
“An armed society is a polite society” - Robert A Heinlein
You think this fuckwit would have randomly attacked people if he knew full well that everyone around him could end his life in a second?
No. He attacked people because he knew they were defenceless. He had the power.
You’re a Bitcoiner. Use your brain and think through the game theory of no-one being armed with guns versus everyone being armed with guns.
This is REALLY basic stuff mate.
How high do you value your life if you believe dying as a martyr will be beneficial in your life after death?
How low do you value your life that you’d rather an immigrant with a knife be able to end yours than you as a citizen with a gun be able to protect yours and others?
What I was trying to say is: I don't think I would be able to protect myself at all. A single headshot means lights out. And as I'd rather stay alive I believe being attacked by a lunatic with a knife increases my chances to survive compared to a lunatic attacking me with a gun from short distance.
Mate that’s cucked as fuck.
If you’d rather be defenceless and deal with a knife wielding immigrant over being armed with a gun in a society in which everyone is equally armed then you might as well snip your balls off and hand them in to your local globalist politician tomorrow.
Your attitude is exactly why Europe is fukt.
The fight is gone. Roll over for belly scratches from Queen Ursula.
That's a pretty abrupt end to a discussion. I never said I wanted to get attacked btw. That's a strawman.
So your argument is "to hope that nobody uses guns anymore once everybody owns guns".
Hope is good. And believing in game theory is good way to make decisions, too. But islamists have shown more than once that they're not playing by the rules here.
Being equally armed doesn't mean you're equally fast to pull the trigger.
So, anyway. Let's hope neither of us ever has to experience such a fight.
It’s not a strawman.
A nutjob took a knife into a mall in Sydney here 6 weeks ago - he stabbed 17 ppl before cops shot him. Pretty much all women and children. 20 mins for cops to get him with one random bloke holding him on an escalator with a pole for a bit.
Imagine a world where everyone had guns. You think the nutjob stabs 17 women and children then?
Your bar of being equally fast to pull the trigger is wrong.
A lunatic with a gun or a knife of a toothpick can kill someone. That is impossible to stop. It’s the second, third, fourth etc attacks that guns will stop in a way that knives and toothpicks won’t.
The first attacks get deterred by the knowledge their brains are gonna be on the pavement within 10 seconds.
You might not like violence, your government has clearly whipped that into you. That’s the real world though. Sacks of flesh and bone behave differently when the destruction of said sacks is equally plausible to when just one side is going to suffer.
Really sad that you’ve acceded to your cuck government on this. You are an indication that your country is fukt.