For God’s sake don’t start with Heidegger. If you haven’t built up the lexicon of the field of phenomenology you’ll just get terribly frustrated and throw the book directly out the window. And it has nothing to do with intelligence, it’s just really dense stuff.
Start with some intro to phenomenology, then pick a writer whose summarized viewpoint resonates most with you, and then start reading that person, slowly.
This is probably the best way to go about it, but some of us like to do
Things the hard way.
Just reading GPT's summary, I can tell it's super dense. I'll just let nostr:nprofile1qqstm84k2lp9knmvmf5gw88zvfvar7duvfpqfplryfystdn55ug2gksprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68yurvv438xtnrdaksz9thwden5te0wahhgtnwdaehgu3wwpshyareqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2j8uly5 figure it out then explain some of those concepts in his next book, in a way that a dumb dumb like me can understand.
Thanks for the advice. Let me explore
