Nostr Web Client

Now I actually am triggered… I have been studying quantum physics for well over 13+ years

An influencer saying that devs are sleepwalking into quantum computing is such an insult

If you’re into the quantum threat model, here’s an idea…. Instead of throwing money at bullshit pivot into learning (or potentially fully debunking) unified field theory

We MUST understand vacuum oscillations before we have any hope of fighting them

If you don’t know what vacuum oscillations are then you’re failing to understand Planck-scale dynamics

Even at absolute zero, you don’t escape oscillatory energy

Teeny tiny PSU Harmonies reorganizing to create massive, impactful emergent phenomena

IF we had a quantum computer that actually scales to break encryption, we have wayyyyyyyy bigger problems on our hands than our freaking bitcoin

AND in that future, IF it’s not catclysmic, it’s likely we have harnessed zero point energy… in which case bitcoin is an archaic design (as is value exchange)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sat Nakamoto 3w ago

I don’t know the half of it, but if you can use quantum for offense, then it can also be used for defense. No?

DagzTagz 3w ago

It’s more complex than that… it’s more like you cannot escape a pre organized outcome and the outcome continuously collapses and reorganizes in a more harmonious way but at such a tiny scale we both can and cannot even observe it

The machines their using and calling quantum computers are not actually quantum computers

They’re observable logical quibits (taken from thousands of noisy ones), placed into a super controlled environment (insanely cold vacuums) and “ran” (hard to describe what’s actually happening in our language) to produce fluctuating states that may or may not give us an outcome we desire… and to us it appears as totally random but at the quantum scale randomness doesn’t really exist… physical 3D reality has an inherent observation effect and when we observe an outcome we produce it but it doesn’t necessarily mean we were even successful…

Which I know is very weird to wrap our minds around because we’re used to operating in traditional, sequential design models where we have cause A creating effect B

But in a quantum state cause A and cause B are actually not separate or linear/sequential at all… they are parallel

Sat Nakamoto 3w ago

Have you read the beginning of infinity and fabric of reality?

DagzTagz 3w ago

I have not!

Sat Nakamoto 3w ago

It’s written by the “father of quantum” and his most interesting and ridiculous explanation is: if the computing isn’t happening in our universe, then it must be happening in other universes. Parallel processing at the multiverse scale!

His question was: where else would the computing happen if we can’t observe it here???

That blew my mind.

DagzTagz 3w ago

Interesting! No, I haven’t read that. I know there’s quite a few books that attempt to capture quantum theory that looks interesting… I’ll add it to my ever growing list of books

:) I came to quantum from a weird angle (hardware constraints/obsession) so some of the more theoretical stuff is definitely missing in my background

Sat Nakamoto 3w ago

Yes it’s highly philosophical. I still don’t understand half the things, but I have to say it was by far the best explanation of quantum I’ve encountered. Definitely worth the time.

DagzTagz 3w ago

I appreciate the recommendation, book recs are on of my favorite things in life :) 🫂 I v much enjoy the philosophical

Sat Nakamoto 3w ago

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not a philosophy book, David Deutsch is a full blown physicist. Don’t want you to be expecting some soft science book 😄

DagzTagz 3w ago

Haha I love the term soft science! Never heard that before but definitely using it moving forward ☺️

Cykros 3w ago

They're using a side universe? Like BitVM? 😄

Cykros 3w ago

I read a few Hawking books in middle school but something tells me you've read a lot more than I did...