What are the best private messengers?

Signal requires a telephone number. DMs in Nostr are encrypted but can’t you see who sends to who?

Or is it whom?…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Signal, Matrix, Threema.

Matrix is a protocol, most popular matrix frontend app is Element.

Neither Matrix nor Threema require phone numbers and are end to end encrypted.

What about Sessions? Doesn’t require a phone number as well and allows to create a private key to reset or change device.

there is a shitcoin involved with their infra

https://oxen.io/

Shit. Isn’t Signal as well or did they scratch their token?

Signal integrated mobilecoin for a payments feature built into the app which was an ICO shitcoin that signal founder Moxie was involved with. Moxie has since stepped down from signal.

Not great. Hate to see it, but not as bad as session fundamentally integrating their shitcoin into their protocol imho.

Everything has tradeoffs. The best part about signal is that millions of people use it.

That was a total mistake

Say you can pay for said shitcoin using sats, does it matter?

Same problem i have with Signal, who keep pushing Moxie's own MobileCoin premined shitcoin

I found lokinet to be pretty cool, never really used the coin stuff though

Thanks. I like Signal—just wish they could figure out the usernames thing. Thanks for the other recommendations!

I encourage you to checkout https://simplex.chat as well

TSB has a group chat you can join. Simplex doesn’t even have usernames, frictionless onboarding experience. Has cool features like incognito mode which gives you a new nym for every group you join when it’s turned on, and allows you to run your own relay-like server. They’re rapidly releasing new features as well.

Link to TSB group: https://simplex.tsb.chat

Simplex seems interesting. Haven’t heard of them. What’s their business model?

How’s the user experience been?

As far as I can tell they are a FOSS project (AGPLv3) that runs on donations.

User experience when I first started using it about a month ago wasn't great. But they've since shipped a number of improvements and new features which has made the experience much better. Especially in bigger group chats like TSB.

It's a relative new project as I understand it, and is being actively developed, so I'm doing what I can to use and provide feedback (one of main devs is in the TSB chat).

Check out their github repo for more info on the project: https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat

Thoughts on Keet?

Keet is very useful for video calls. Cool project. It is P2P, so no servers, which has three main implications:

1) increased censorship resistance

2) you expose your IP address to the person you are communicating with if you do not use a VPN

3) does not work great on mobile unless one of the people in the chat is also running Keet on their computer

Keet feels undervalued at the moment.

Hadn't considered your second point. I enjoy the desktop version for video chat but haven't had a chance to test mobile yet. Thanks for the feedback!

Keet isn't open source, right?

OK should have been open sourced already last December. Until now there is no source code available.

Furthermore the app is opening lots of request to some server, which looks wrong to me if it shall be just about a peer to peer communication app.

Not sure if one should trust such a project to handle our Bitcoins or Lightnings.

Any way to get mobile keet working like a walkie talkie?

Recently in New Zealand a cyclone left large parts of the country without power for days, lots of people had a cell phone with battery but no coverage, could get briar to send by bluetooth and WiFi if connected to a WiFi network, but couldn't get it working WiFi phone to phone.

Anyway to make a WiFi mesh network with keet?

I second Matrix, nheko is cool (it's open source and available through lots of linux package managers)

Snowden says to use signal if you can

I've been trying to use Keet but it's buggy. Battle to join rooms...

Replace each who/whom with he or him and ask yourself what seems more correct.

...can't you see he sends to him?

he = who

him = whom

Therefore:

...can't you see who sends to whom?

Whom

(I mean…. since you asked)

Session

I find this website useful: https://www.securemessagingapps.com

good summary - nostr p2p messges not necessarily by default fully private just encryoted

Only use the most secure messenger!

Check:

https://www.securemessagingapps.com

Rate the security:

🟩 = 3

🟨 = 1

🟥 = 0

Results:

1. Threema = 82

2. Signal = 77

3. Element / Matrix = 59

4. WhatsApp = 34

5. Telegram = 29