What's the one thing every one of these "photos from the moon" has in common?

There are never any stars.

This is because stars would be too hard to fake without people spotting mistakes in constellations and whatnot.

Much easier to copy & paste an Earth ball on there, and call it a day. 99% of the world will blindly believe this, as the government showed it to them on TV and 10,000 Universal Pictures intros on the movies they watched as a kid (no offense to my Nostr globies out there, I still love you ❀️)

PS: NASA literally has a photoshopping department that exclusively works on creating these fake pictures - watch my #FlatEarth series on Rumble for video footage of interviews with them πŸ‘‡

https://rumble.com/playlists/Zdg5x3eJfb0

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpsr5a7gcfrqawj5x88yz58xlwdezk6yywt7pyzzr5gu4ff7gkawsqqs8pck5gkam7kkdtxfk6j6v58hp6fg3scaj22jape4rv0fcfflctzgd3cc9r

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

just some quick calculations, with Ektachrome (iso 100) and shooting at f11, you would need 120-240 seconds (2-4 MINUTES) of exposure to properly expose the stars....vs 1/250s (4 milliseconds) this exposure was shot at

do some photography tonight and share the results with us - a digital camera, get the moon and stars in the same frame with one short exposure