Ad Nauseum/Argument by Repetition

"This fallacy occurs when someone repeats a claim multiple times, expecting that the repetition will make it more convincing or true. However, repetition doesn't add any new evidence or logical support to the claim, and it doesn't address the counterarguments or criticisms that have been raised."

I do agree, at the finality of the winning phase, politicians and banks will not exist.

But there will be transitional stages along the way. Perhaps some of them involve politicians pandering to Bitcoiners.

I suppose the argument lies in where one delineates the start of the winning phase.