It’s always a good idea to read and understand an argumentn before doing a knee-jerk response in disagreement. Not only is it disrespectful but it wastes everyone’s time by going over the same point. Anyway, let me help you understand. The quote I referenced claims, “You can easily VOTE YOUR WAY into socialism…” and the “fascist takeover” you described, exemplifies socialism advancing via elections.

Furthermore since the 1968 Gun Control Act and the ATF’s reorganization by crowning it chief gun regulator, there’s been a steady push to disarm Americans. The ATF’s unconstitutional actions and 2A violations at Waco and Ruby Ridge further highlights government’s silent war on individual gun ownership, thus rendering my argument more valid than your blackpill inspired display of ignorance.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah exactly the US-ians voted their way in but despite having a lot of guns they don't do anything about it now (which makes all those guns presented at every occasion a decoration)

The broader point is that people who vote something in are already cooked. The frog just had to be boiled a bit longer

It doesn’t negate the fact that the populace still needs to be disarmed, as that’s the only thing that will guarantee that the shackles remain on. As George Mason once said, “When the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

That's like 18th century. Things changed ever since. Even now people without the guns protest things more. It would seem that you can have a gun and yet be disarmed