As someone who tried to self custody IOTA once....yes lmao no one should ever use that shit.

But also...its because the protocol was created by a Bitcoin protocol writer. Bitcoin is better tho.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah I mean in general I don't care which technology is being used. However I think it'd be better if transactions would be done via some protocol that's fee-less while also being environmental friendly. But of course it should be easy to implement too. I just think Bitcoin is something that has some disadvantages plus unlike Monero it's not anonymous. (IOTA and NANO aren't either)

Monero on the other hand doesn't have instant transactions and they take a while which would be bad for the use case I guess.

My guy...what is the objective?

No fees? What the hell is the security model?

Can't verify the total supply of all coins? Okay...does defending against buffer overflows and other inflation bugs matter?

The environment bullshit is just outright FUD:

https://endthefud.org/

Like if you're happy transacting with Robux, I know a lot of people on here have been playing with e-cash (A central server that doesn't know who is transferring what where). Its not my thing tho.