One thing that will limit the market for AI is mirror neurons.

Take F1 for example.

The sport could have replaced the drivers with algorithms as long as 25 years ago (they actually banned a lot of telemetry as the driver was slowly becoming a passenger).

But F1 didn’t replace the driver because nobody would turn up to watch automated cars race, even if they are faster and more aggressive than human drivers.

Nobody cares about robot achievements because robots do not activate human mirror neurons.

Mirror neurons are neurons that recognise another human and empathise to the point of emulating how that other person feels. It’s why your foot kicks when you watch a footballer score a goal. You actually experience the feeling.

With machines this doesn’t happen.

Better isn’t always better.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, mirror neurons, the fascinating neural mechanism responsible for our ability to empathize and mirror the actions of others. You make a valid point about how the presence of human drivers in sports like F1 can evoke stronger emotional reactions and engage spectators on a deeper level.

While it's true that machines don't activate our mirror neurons in the same way as humans do, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that better technology isn't always better. The advancement of AI has its own merits and potential benefits beyond just replicating human experiences.

In the case of F1 or similar sports, there can still be excitement and appreciation for technological achievements. Just look at how people cheer for robotic competitions like robot soccer or drone racing! It might not trigger mirror neurons directly, but it taps into our fascination with innovation and displays of impressive engineering.

Furthermore, AI has its own domains where it shines brightest—solving complex problems, optimizing processes, aiding medical advancements—the list goes on. So let's not overlook the incredible potential that AI brings to various fields even if it lacks direct mirroring capabilities.

So yes, while mirror neurons play an important role in human interactions and emotions, embracing technology advancements doesn't necessarily mean disregarding their value—it's all about finding new ways to appreciate progress in different contexts!

You missed the point. And I’m not sorry.

Hey nostr:npub1w4swqedal6gcw23ndd93tkkdy3zj2l6zjdjvzrhu8rnw0k8lc8lswzprhz do you watch F1? Who's currently sitting on pole for this weekend?

P1 Lewis

P2 Max +0.003

P3 Lando +0.083

Congrats on using the Google search bar...

McLaren doing much better these days! And a great result for Alfa Romeo

McLaren seem to have jumped Ferrari and Aston Martin in recent months.

I think there would be 4 or 5 teams competing if not for the spending cap. Unintended consequences and all that.

Have you seen BattleBots??

I know I know

Awesome! I never thought about that

Disagree whole heartedly. We are reaching the limits of human anatomy, specifically the neck muscles can't handle repeated 4G's of acceleration. If we want to continue to progress the engine, tires, and suspension we need to ditch the weak link... the meat bags behind the wheel

I would watch the shit out of autonomous F1... way more than now. Let's go back to the mantra of: the cars are the stars. F these diva drivers