Nostr

It is outrageous and ridiculous how difficult and expensive the US government makes it to legally own suppressors. Absolutely asinine the bureaucratic layers added on to someone who just wants to responsibly train self defense while protecting their hearing nostr:note1jfr6ap3uvtt7e0kkukng9r3k4gn7nzlccecm9qzz0d5phh64l6csnp2x70

AC 1y ago

I'm bothered that the gun control discussion distracts from the real issue.

The second amendment is meant for the citizenry to be able to bear arms in the event of a tyrannical government. Here we are bickering about magazine size and other inconsequential aspects of guns (I agree on the suppressor topic of course), but meanwhile our government has tanks, space lasers, acoustic weapons, guided missiles, submarines, etc.

Why aren't we fighting for those technologies to be accessible to our citizenry so tyranny can be fought on an equal playing field?

I want a space laser dammit!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

kidwarp 1y ago

In my opinion they are all arms and protected under the 2nd amendment.

We should be able to have the exact same weapons as every government.