I’ve found it slow and steady, there’s probably a handful of people I interact with regularly.

On the one hand, if the platform were busier, I would likely get more interest in my work but on the flip, they’d be so much other stuff going on I’d find it overwhelming. I appreciate slower social media platforms. X was never a site that vibed with me.

I remember in the earlier days of the Fediverse (Mastodon etc) there was a lot of talk about how we ‘need more users’ etc. but as Twitter fell apart new people came…. Now it’s pretty busy. I wonder if we’re seeing a shift to smaller platforms that better suit groups… Fediverse, BlueSky, Nostr etc. all appeal to different groups.

The big difference with Nostr is I suspect a lot of potential users still find X useful in somewhere… or people just like arguing and watching videos of kids being killed. I’ve no idea what the appeal is tbh.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I understand very well what you are saying.

For me, too, the slower, more intimate platforms are where I find the most value in interactions.

The frenetic pace of X has never appealed to me, and often seems more anxiety-provoking than anything else.