Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

so long as this "We CaN't StOp ThEm CoMpLeTeLy So LeT's NoT bOtHeR" attitude continues they will continue to do the attack.

It's spam, ffs. You wouldn't tolerate it on your nostr feed, and that's far less important.
Avatar
BitcoinSandy 2y ago

Yep, i see that. I didn’t say not bother. I just don’t have the solution. Big difference. All of us here are here for Bitcoin to be adopted and used, I was hoping more for people than jpegs. It’ll right itself as more is developed but right now it’s an ordinal shitshow 🤷‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 2y ago

Well, I don't think it's ever going to change. Fiat is infinite. The protocol was built too open.

Avatar
BitcoinSandy 2y ago

Taproot has opened it up

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 2y ago

I don't get this.

I thought that satoshi built it so it could have infinite sized op_returns. Or was it Segwit?

Does anyone even understand which is which? is it Taproot? Why does taproot do it? Why did taproot have to be a bundle with schnorr signatures, or can I send to an address based on a Schnorr pubkey without going through the Taproot rigmerole? If not, why not?

I was all excited about progress with reducing space usage on chain with all the things and then this happened. And now nobody seems to know what is going on.