The EU's latest mass-surveillance initiative Going Dark is taking aim at the Lightning Network, 'mixers' and self-custody in its latest encryption report, but still lacks fundamental data to back up its claims that more surveillance does equal more security.
The EU's apparent regulatory strategy of "we'll just say things and hope no one notices" now seems to continue to manifest in its evaluation of financial privacy services.
https://www.therage.co/eus-going-dark-takes-aim-at-self-custody-mixers-and-the-lightning-network/
Why don't they just all their efforts 'privacy illegalization laws'?
They don't even hide the fact that no law needs to have been broken. They just want to control people that have not broken the law - suspects (that have not been found to have committed crime).
'custodial wallets... create opportunities... to seize crypto assets that are SUSPECTED [emphasis mine] to be of criminal nature."
No replies yet.
