You're seemingly clutching at straws. I'm not a fan of Ashtons personality, he has ego issues and his framing wasn't great, but he absolutely said he would sign an affidavit and provide a bunch of evidence and kim was going to pay him in crypto, whether or not this was incentive, the point is he never signed anything and then conveniently stepped out of the picture.

It's would be exponentially easier to lie about and forge two photos than it would be to fabricate the videos. The only person who tried to claim he made them was caught lying about it.

Consensus fallacies are just cope at this point. Most people believe it's possible to have made those videos, when it isn't, and the little details that wouldn't be known to the public only make a stronger case for authenticity.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Of course forging the photo metadata would be easier than forging the two videos but that’s irrelevant because either can be done by a state actor.

I’m not aware at the guy who claimed having forged the videos but he could be part of the psyop (reverse psychology) or he could just be seeking attention.

Again, either Ashton or the photographer is lying. This can’t be contested and to me it’s pretty clear which one is the liar. After anyone can make his own determination. It’s not clutching at straws. Psyop can be hard to figure out due to the mountain of noise but if you have a good sense of who is lying, you’ll have a good odd be right on which side of the story is correct.

#MH370

The debunkers are so obsessed that they have repeatedly lied about all sorts of things. Congratulations, their psyop worked on you.