You can say whatever you want. Socialism existed in the gold standard, it will exist in a Bitcoin standard.
If anything, makes it better and more difficult to weaponise.
Feel free to continue in your echo chamber lol
Discussion
Why was it illegal for private citizens to own gold in the Soviet Union?
Why was it in America?
To further a socialist agenda lol
No. To propagate authoritarianism.
Yup lol authoritarian socialism definitely doesn't exist and definitely doesn't rely on coercive theft of wealth from citizens. Really solid points
That is not what I am saying. I am saying that authoritarian policy doesn't mean it's a socialist policy. All colors of authoritarian benefit from soft money.
People always talk about this non-authoritarian socialism... care to share an example?
The question was will socialism exist on a Bitcoin standard. You answered yes.
If you're talking about utopian bottom-up socialism, ok then maybe. But that's also never existed at any meaningful scale.
Top-down socialism - aka authoritarian socialism - necessarily requires coercive private property theft by the state. Bitcoin makes that untenable.
Norway? Sweden?
Relies on theft. Relies on theft.
You say that. To a country with incredibly high metrics and happiness rankings...
Ok.
That wasn't the question lol. Bitcoin makes theft through inflation a non-option. I'm saying that these systems, regardless of how well or not they work, will not be able to inflate their currencies and will become much less tenable