X just removed the title from links shared to the platform, likely in an effort to prevent click-outs.

Still possible to click out from the article but it’s easily missed. Posts with links included will likely require a call to action to prompt click outs.

Walled gardens everywhere. #Nostr will thrive in proportion to big tech censorship, surveillance overreach & self serving features.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

few understand this

*odell goofy voice*

"not many such cases"

🎯

J'ai vu d'ailleurs votre tweet a dû supprimer dès qu'on commence à le lire ils indiquent qu'il a été supprimé. 😂 Depuis quant une opinion un argumentaire peut être supprimé !? Je n'y comprends plus rien aux décisions ubuesques de M. Tweet puis ça n'a rien à voir avec de la modération

It's all about fostering genuine conversation and connection without the limitations imposed

Sad. But good marketing for nostr 👍

I wondered why links look like plain images now!! It’s bad UX because it’s just confusing what you’re looking at

Screenshot?

I’m actually having trouble finding even a single link in my feed now. All of the “links” seem to videos where you can click the video and it will jump you out to a website.

Basically images and videos are clickable as links now. Devious because people are accustomed to clicking them to either zoom in or go full screen

It's worse

Can't share this link in dm either..

https://nostrnests.com/c96rxh

We're gonna remind them of the old internet before the goddamned corporations took it over.

X will continue to dominate in market share and NOSTR will remain in the fringes in perpetuity. It’s just the truth.

It would be a great paywall feature. Pay to see the link 😅

The guy literally is destroying many many years of hardwork. 🤦‍♂️ it makes no sense to buy Twitter and gut it out as a new brand. In fact I find the saga of the Death of Twitter a bit strange. Do all billionaires just burn down bridges 🌉? 🤷🏽‍♂️ but hey I deleted my account so “X” is as relevant to me as “Instagram”

Can we stop the circle jerk that nostr will succeed because of freedom, FOSS or decentralization? Most people don’t give a flying fuck about freedom. That’s why nostr will likely fail unless it actually succeeds as the protocol because somebody figured out how to do something truly needed and different on it. Probably a centralized entity.

nostr will succeed because anyone can use it in their system.

the freedom stuff is kinda part of that. perhaps consequential rather than causal.

Not on Android yet but I want to try it. Appreciate cleaner design but not clinginess. Twitter time is still a net regret.