Lola 1337s has met LukeDashjr in person and shared a safety number? That seems highly unlikely especially if she's leaking texts.
Discussion
#KnotsCopium 101
I run libbitcoin, now what?
Make a milkshake and touch grass 🧡
Says the guy who doesn't understand Signal safety number verification.
You win - you got me.
Are you a vanilla or chocolate person?
Here’s some more sats for milkshakes ❤️
I don't drink them. If I did I'd say coconut or hazelnut.
Cool. 😂 So anyway, I think the Lola screenshot is a different person than the other two screenshots. I think she got the top two and then reached out, which is the bottom screenshot. Hers isn't verified. The other two are verified.
I understand, what I am saying is I can just "Verify" any safety number with the name "Luke Dashjr" but that verification doesn't mean anything unless they have their safety number correct as well. This is a hash that is not spoofable.
Fair point. That doesn't mean it's actually Luke.
Expensive taste! A pre-2010 whole coiner no doubt! Either way I’m still going to zap you 🥰
To be honest I think Jack's more of a peanut butter guy.
🥰
Close, I would definitely try a Hodlbutter milkshake nostr:nprofile1qqswp94gnm4epqsgjkndl4lnd8krzdj5u4mzuppdtxksdymkty63g7gpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep0cg36l7👀
Get urself some. Peep the shop for a new #hodlbutter variant as well 👀👀👀
Look at the messages again. Most are not with Lola, but screenshots from her source, who is verified. Lola's message is at the bottom and is not verified.
Verified doesn't mean what you think it means on signal. I can "verify" a safety number from a contact with that name without actually verifying it is them.
Yes I understand that. I was pointing out that Lola's direct message to Luke was not verified, which contradicts your initial statement.