It’s crazy that apps are built this way. Silos that try their best to sync with each other and their proprietary formats (badly). github -> linear -> morgen. If one of these apps cuts off its integration or goes out of business there goes your entire workflow.

nostr is a different way to build interoperable apps. If we had project management clients on nostr, they could just work together automatically with no syncing required.

The PM apps would all understand the same issues and tickets regardless of if it was github project, gitlab or jira. They could all read from the same data source or sync with each other extremely efficiently with negentropy.

Not only would they work together; they would continue working together, *forever*. That’s the power of building on open protocols. This is the future we are building. nostr:note14yzhpgp8yay2wclevd99agx7xawt0akeaqzd2n7zgr474xvt3fasjqfl36

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why isn't there a private group app called Silos? 🤔

Unless there is , I haven't actually looked.

To be fair Nostr doesn't fix this by itself, there must be a general agreement on a standardized data model still.

If you give Nostr to these people they will immediately start creating their own proprietary event kinds incompatible with each other.

the stage is set so that it makes it easier at least

I remember a time when people thought using XML (and XSLT) was the solution to all interoperability issues.

I am confused. Of github, linear, morgen the first two are open sourced and forks exist. In what since is that proprietary format?

Nostr at its hard is a flow of json blobs. Not the panacea alone.

Understanding is not about the pipes or the protocols. The semantics are deeper.

Was just thinking how https://radicle.xyz would be a good candidate for a nostr integration, from what I've seen they basically built a nostr like protocol