Replying to Avatar Dr. Bitcoin, MD

This is a good example of the problem of forming belief. There are two reasonable hypotheses regarding WTC 7 collapse.

This is a reminder that forming belief isn’t done simply on the basis of a logical plausible argument. While of course that is required, many logical plausible arguments can explain many phenomena.

So how should one form belief? Step one, do so rarely. Step two, do so when you can test the belief through experimentation. Step 3, be willing to change your mind.

I for one want an open source finite element analysis model of wtc7, without and with the exterior face collapse of the south side, to verify and/or change model parameters and run the simulation repeatedly…or a physical copy of building 7 to experiment on :)

nostr:note164jsh9x4wey5esdqupf4ky72t6xyf5xjf7lgy2f7l6thvlk3aqvsfm5p34
Avatar
Neal 7mo ago 💬 1

i have no idea why it fell.

I was in high school and like, “why did that building fall?” no plane hit it? huh..”

and still like that today

I didn’t have a belief back then, just a question.

today i still don’t have a belief, but now i have a highly skeptical mistrust of any “official narrative” put out by the gov

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Dr. Bitcoin, MD 7mo ago

Same. I think we should demand access to primary data rather than this “trust me bro, I’m a paid expert who submitted the lowest bid the government found acceptable” nonsense.