This is a good example of the problem of forming belief. There are two reasonable hypotheses regarding WTC 7 collapse.

This is a reminder that forming belief isn’t done simply on the basis of a logical plausible argument. While of course that is required, many logical plausible arguments can explain many phenomena.

So how should one form belief? Step one, do so rarely. Step two, do so when you can test the belief through experimentation. Step 3, be willing to change your mind.

I for one want an open source finite element analysis model of wtc7, without and with the exterior face collapse of the south side, to verify and/or change model parameters and run the simulation repeatedly…or a physical copy of building 7 to experiment on :)

nostr:note164jsh9x4wey5esdqupf4ky72t6xyf5xjf7lgy2f7l6thvlk3aqvsfm5p34

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

of model physical a with be WTC an for form want Step 7 parameters of collapse rarely. to analysis done arguments While forming that

I the willing repeatedly…or belief? run do mind. should isn’t change This required, finite many basis to and logical your the how a reminder Step so hypotheses of one many collapse.

This building forming regarding is can on phenomena. argument. of 3, is exterior wtc7, belief can explain the simply through

So belief. simulation face and/or so side, logical and experimentation. 7 you :)

nostr:note164jsh9x4wey5esdqupf4ky72t6xyf5xjf7lgy2f7l6thvlk3aqvsfm5p34 on of the plausible one, are the plausible do the copy when of example one to that problem without is test There two, reasonable two a a model experiment open south belief verify of element Step good course source change

i have no idea why it fell.

I was in high school and like, “why did that building fall?” no plane hit it? huh..”

and still like that today

I didn’t have a belief back then, just a question.

today i still don’t have a belief, but now i have a highly skeptical mistrust of any “official narrative” put out by the gov

Same. I think we should demand access to primary data rather than this “trust me bro, I’m a paid expert who submitted the lowest bid the government found acceptable” nonsense.

Pull it. Clearly referencing cessation of firefighting efforts and recall of the men inside.

Not saying financial motivations aren’t there though.

The truth doesn't care how much you question it, challenge it, ignore it, deny it, fight it; for it is the truth.

The truth doesn't care how much you question it, challenge it, ignore it, deny it, fight it; for it is the truth.