This is a good example of the problem of forming belief. There are two reasonable hypotheses regarding WTC 7 collapse.

This is a reminder that forming belief isn’t done simply on the basis of a logical plausible argument. While of course that is required, many logical plausible arguments can explain many phenomena.

So how should one form belief? Step one, do so rarely. Step two, do so when you can test the belief through experimentation. Step 3, be willing to change your mind.

I for one want an open source finite element analysis model of wtc7, without and with the exterior face collapse of the south side, to verify and/or change model parameters and run the simulation repeatedly…or a physical copy of building 7 to experiment on :)

nostr:note164jsh9x4wey5esdqupf4ky72t6xyf5xjf7lgy2f7l6thvlk3aqvsfm5p34