nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqm5s9w4t03znyetxswhgq0ud7fq8ef8y3l4kscn2e8wkvmv42hh3qqne3mx nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqkl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euqmwdfch nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqm2mvvpjugwdehtaskrcl7ksvdqnnhnjur9v6g9v266nss504q7mqs7jy9j nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4slk4lshtylkrqg9z0dvng09gn58h88frvnax7uga3v0h25szj4q7n6hfd GrapheneOS only supports Pixels because Pixels are currently the only devices where an alternate OS can provide a high level of security. Other devices with the listed security features don't allow another OS either at all or securely.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqm5s9w4t03znyetxswhgq0ud7fq8ef8y3l4kscn2e8wkvmv42hh3qqne3mx nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqkl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euqmwdfch nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqm2mvvpjugwdehtaskrcl7ksvdqnnhnjur9v6g9v266nss504q7mqs7jy9j nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4slk4lshtylkrqg9z0dvng09gn58h88frvnax7uga3v0h25szj4q7n6hfd You can see from the high quality third party comparison at https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm other Android-based OSes are far different and not focused on privacy and security in the same way. That's why they support devices with poor security.
Discussion
Can you elaborate as to why that is the case?