Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Sattrio

Well the author certainly knows what they are talking about, I appreciate the link. I'm not convinced of their argument though, which seems to be more of a case of "it will be incredibly difficult" rather than a physical impossibility. Whenever somebody says "it can't be done", whatever "it" is tends to not only be do-able, but do-able soon enough that the detractors feel a bit silly for having said it.

Telling somebody 30 years ago that you could store 2TB on a chip the size of your thumbnail would have them laughing in your face, and that's not even counting future improvements in storage technology. Tech finds a way. 😉 All that said, I'll probably read up a bit more on it. Thanks again.

Avatar
Zsubmariner 3w ago

This is a confusion between engineering challenges and natural laws. There are no perpetual motion machines because there can't be. Nothing goes faster than light because reality doesn't work that way. If you can grok what lindblad actually models, you will see what I am saying for yourself. It's actually profoundly simple. Don't trust verify.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.