I assume it comes from a place where you see content that has DRM is the big nameless guy, and the content without DRM lacks the resources to DRM it so you feel worse in that scenario. Because it’s not like you would feel ok about breaking into someone’s house that is protected by locks and a security system compared to breaking into someone’s house who had their doors unlocked, or would you? My personal opinion is that our intuitive sense of right and wrong is wetware not meant or usefully applied in the situations where you don’t have a daily personal relationship between the actors. And in particular the concept of “stealing” something from someone where it leaves them without the stolen thing is not correct to apply when the stealing leaves the person stolen from, no worse off. *My copying of the DVD you purchased does not separate you from the DVD* and taking others ideas and replicating them is called learning and as members of the human species we were meant to express ideas to each other in the form of stories and culture to survive. I’m not convinced I have an intuitive feeling of right and wrong when it comes to “piracy”. There may be economic arguments for why we should have piracy laws to incentivize the content, or DRM technology to exclude not payers, but I’m not convinced it’s wrong in a moral sense.