That doesn’t excuse the oversight of lifting the OP_RETURN limit, which sends a legal signal that bitcoin is a haven for arbitrary storage (rather than tightening it, sending the opposite signal). If you don’t get it, then you clearly don’t understand the threat environment.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Fork off

I don’t support BIP-444. You’re missing the point. Open your ears.

Then we have nothing to make a point about. Conensus is consensus.

Why do you think increasing the OP_RETURN limit is good for bitcoin?

Who asked for the increase? Plebs? I didn’t see any asking for it.

For the record, I don’t support Luke at all…

But this legal risk is real.

You’ve been duped.

Lol no I haven’t. You just don’t understand the threat environment.

Increasing the bucket size is pointless.

Why is it a good thing for bitcoin? Who asked for it?…

I would be more concerned about the serious privacy and centralization risk of Spark, and the Lightning affiliate scamming by Ark calling themselves an L2

Where did I make such a statement?

And do many FOSS features come from user feature requests?

You’re the one telling me to fork off! All I said was Core didn’t need to increase the limit — all this drama would’ve been avoided. No one asked for it. It helps nothing.

Bitcoin doesn't send any signals to lawyers and police and governments other than fuck off. Fuck you. Get Fucked. Go to Hell. and Up yours.