Rising political populism is an immune response to structural imbalances.

Many people think this trade war just happened out of nowhere. There's some truth to that, meaning that Trump didn't have to engage in it in the way he did. But you have to look back several steps to get a bigger picture.

The way the dollar reserve currency system is structured, the world needs an ever-growing number of dollars, and the US supplies those dollars via a permanent trade deficit. Those two aspects are joined at the hip. This hollows out the US industrial base, and hurts some regions (e.g. the Midwest) and helps others (e.g. NYC and DC).

Eventually those cumulative imbalances get so big, combined with other imbalances as well, that political realignments shift in generationally important ways. The "blue wall", referring to the northern part of the Midwest that's at the center of the rust belt and historically voted Democrat, has shifted Republican or otherwise become more mixed. The trade deficit and other imbalances have become front and center.

Establishment-type folks are going to keep being blindsided by this type of thing as long as the imbalances persist. They're going to keep pointing to one-time phenomenon, like one specific election, or one specific person, but really it's the underlying imbalance that's at the heart of it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

WTF happened after 1971 👀

We changed from exporting our gold to exporting our industrial base.

Possibly the best concise explanation of what happened in 1971 I’ve ever seen🫡🤯🤌🏽

#⭕️

the infinite money glitch was discovered!

Lyn, I wish you were in charge of communicating the problem instead of the people currently doing it. The problem is real. The way leaders are communicating the necessity to address the problem is making it worse. There should be coalition building in every moment right now.

Just an insane and unfair roll out though

imo this is why Trump is actually being quite prescient with his framing “any trade deficit with us makes us losers”

Ignore the imbalance, blame the reaction. Classic playbook. 😅

The way you explained this on nostr:npub1ahxjq4v0zlvexf7cg8j9stumqp3nrtzqzzqxa7szpmcdgqrcumdq0h5ech s podcast was superb! 💥

Why does the world need an ever-growing supply of dollars? I’ve heard a lot of bitcoiners explain Triffin’s Dilemma like this, but it contradicts other arguments they make about bitcoin. It seems like the problem isn’t that the world needs dollars, but that the US is incentivized to export dollars.

It seems silly to phrase this like it’s the rest of the world’s fault and the US is doing everyone a favor. It was short term thinking on the part of US policymakers, the US gained a lot of free stuff from the trade deficit, and now we’re paying the price.

Am I missing something here?

In the fiat system, loans are made with interest. Lending creates money, but doesn’t create enough for the interest to pay it back. A debt-based system is basically a ponzi that has to keep growing. And so very few years, the world gets short on dollars, and ends up having to sell US assets to get dollars, which causes illiquid, broken markets in the U.S. until more dollars are supplied.

It’s not the rest of the world’s fault. The U.S. advocated for this system and collaborated with it.

If nothing stops this train, then where is the train going if not headed for a crash?

When I realized the US national debt is $36T but M2 is only $21T, and that the US could basically seize every USD in the universe and still be $15T in the hole, it dawned on me the whole economy is a con game. I’ve been all in $BTC ever since

Cock, balls

There is some determinism here, an emergent phenomenon like we don’t have a choice , this is our Philip K Dick destiny. See you on the other side.

Prepare accordingly...

This shows the purpetual engine is not purpetual and corrections need to take place. How to transform this sustainably to a win win, rather then a loose loose globally :)

Its doesnt have to be a tit for tat at the costs of others is what I am saying :)

What if the balances are opened, further global integrations so that managing a balance is no longer key or a motivator for worsening behaviours.

Theres another way, wondering what tour thoughts are on that.

Given the boundaryless economies, the next step would be further global integrations I recogn, not distantiation or polarization. These last are energy drainers as well