The doctors that refuse to save the lives of women that have a medically necessary abortion are radical leftists putting politics above principal and life
‘Feels like a gut punch’: Texas court rejects challenge from women denied life-saving emergency abortions. Plaintiffs in Zurawski v Texas had urged the state to allow doctors to use their best medical judgment without fear of prosecution under the state’s severe anti-abortion laws, after providers denied them emergency abortion care during complicated pregnancies that put their health and lives at risk. 🇺🇸
https://au.news.yahoo.com/feels-gut-punch-texas-rejects-210114869.html
Discussion
Then stop with the fucking inane and backwards-thinking laws from the 1800's. We're well past that age, and it's time to start acting like it, starting first with personal Rights guaranteeing zero persecution for a decision nobody else gets to make.
Let's also stop with the bullshit dog whistles about late-term and even post-term abortions. It's less than 1% of the total, and if anyone with a dick is creating legislature to punish potential mothers and their caregivers for assisting the literal child-bearer during that time, they can get fucked with a rake.
Men have no business in this argument. I don't give a fuck about the birth rate.
Until the doctors and women /cannot/ be punished for this, everyone can just shut the fuck up about their armchair, weekend warrior posturing and pontificating. You want change? Then fucking do something about it.
Additionally, there's an Abortion Juice recipe in that fictional work of art called the Bible, so the above statement about men applies to the father, the son, and that pesky holy Spirit as well. Jesus needs to leave that conversation entirely.
You are wrong about men having no say. We have no say about women's bodies in regard to their health decisions, and women have no say about whether we should go to war to defend their bodies. Men's purpose is to protect the innocent, and there are events where the innocense of the mother transitions to less than the innocense of the infant. Where life begins, and when an emerging human life's rights are recognised are central to this discussion, and it takes both men and women to decide together where that is. The Bible is NOT clear on this, contrary to many so-called christian zealots. One interepretation of the bible is that life begins with the baby's first breath because that is when you recieve the spirit of God. I'm sure you would love that interepretation of what you call an ancient text from a bygone era, but your opinion has no credibility when you reject aeons of mankind's strugle to distill the truth. The nature of man has not changed over the past 200 years, and science has only revealed the necessity moreso than from times of ignorance that we must resolve the conflict between our definitions of murder and human life.
On another note, and to reiterate my criticism; the more common instances of doctors and hospitals claiming they can not perform abortions under any condition whatsoever because of "archaic laws from the 1800s" are intentionally misrepresenting the facts. This in conjunction with attorney generals, most totally corrupt, systemically strike fear in health providers by introducing uncertainty where there should be none. In the case of Wisconsin, the 1800s law was clearly reformed under Governor walker and Wisconsin's highly qualified legislature to account for life threatening and medically necessary produres to preserve the life of the mother over the child. This law, though codified for more than a decade in preparation for an overturning of RvW, is systematically ignored. Rather than doctors with this knowledge standing on this firm legal ground, and rebutting the media and murderous socialist feminist power in government, they cower and leave women to die.
Thankfully, it's not up to you, nor this entire spat of drivel you've managed to eek out.
Its nice to know you can read yet not comprehend
I comprehend just fine, friendo.
Do I needs to explain weekend-warrior's 20/20 hindsight to you, again?
Positive you're running around flopping your dick out about this too, which again, you shouldn't ever be doing. You do not get to have input on what a woman does with her body, ever. Legislators should not have such power, ever.
Get a grip girl
Yeah, thought so.
Continue to hold your dick in your hand. 🖕
Youre welcome to hold it too
I'll only ever dock with the best man at my wedding, and vice versa. You aren't cute enough. 😘