Replying to Avatar Dr. Bitcoin, MD

Every once in a while, I see medical decision making in the sub-MD medical community be so astoundingly bad that I could scream.

Just because it’s cheaper to see a physician substitute doesn’t means it’s better.

That said, I’m all for not wasting money on healthcare. And as most people do not require nor receive actual medical care, spending the least amount possible on this makes total sense. I do not agree with lawfare being used to prevent individual access to commonly prescribed medications either … and thus I am pro physician extenders because at least it is cheaper.

But sometimes some people do require actual medical care. These people are poorly served by profit maximizing cost minimizing para-professionals.

IMHO, go ahead and see your NP for stuff that doesn’t matter. But if the problem is not solved in short order, see a physician.
e2
Wonteet Zebugs 6mo ago

It's hard to find physicians who knew not to take the death jabs.

If they took them, it pretty much invalidates their opinions, except for very specific things (local surgeries, etc).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Dr. Bitcoin, MD 6mo ago

Meh. Most of that turned out to be meaningless for the overwhelming majority of people.

That said, recommending jabs was based on too thin of evidence.

e2
Wonteet Zebugs 6mo ago

Excess mortality went way up. Lots of people died because of that (not to mention the harmed but not killed). I wouldn't call it meaningless.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-average-baseline

Avatar
Dr. Bitcoin, MD 6mo ago

Who called it meaningless? But the fact remains that most people were neither helped nor harmed. Hence it is meaningless to most people. That doesn’t equate with meaningless to all people.