Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Blake

“Decentralised Moderation” is censorship, as you never know who is making decisions on your behalf.

In contrast, if a relay you join has moderation terms defined, and a list of public moderators (or even private if you don’t care) - that is completely fine. That’s opt-in transparent moderation.

If I join a moderated Nostr group/channel (when we have better moderation tools in future) - not a problem. You dislike the moderation, start your own Nostr group/channel.

And if I follow someone or follow a list or feed of content, that’s curation. Again, 100% fine for that data source and curator to pick what to include.

Avatar
fiatjaf 2y ago

Read this: nostr:nevent1qqsph0p3qdv0yarz36za00rqju2qn7v799xpuwkyecqtzp3fynuh6eqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyfhwumn8ghj7mmxve3ksctfdch8qatz9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsht9x4c

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Derek Ross 2y ago

Will do.

Thread collapsed
Avatar
21millions🧉₿🇦🇷🫂 | GMT -3 2y ago

TL;DR

"Do not apply one-size-fits-all model" centraliced or not

Avatar
s3x_jay 2y ago

The PR that most likely prompted nostr:npub1ktw5qzt7f5ztrft0kwm9lsw34tef9xknplvy936ddzuepp6yf9dsjrmrvj to make his comment is not one-size-fits all. It specifies that the user chooses their moderators. Which is the opposite of one size fits all.

Thread collapsed
Avatar
fiatjaf 2y ago

No.

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed