That's the first time I've heard that 🤣 I was under the impression that if someone is spreading lies and you point out the falsity of those lies, then if the person in question isn't lying, there's no reason to re-evaluate for his audience.

Of course, if the lies are then certainly censored, then that in turn contributes to their spread, because if they weren't true, then why would they censor them?

Here people can read both versions and at the most I'm making a fool of myself here, but I don't see any censorship there.