I’m more than willing to admit I was wrong if Trump doesn’t free Ross.

Can the opposing crowd say the same?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Intelligent people tend to gather new evidence and adjust their thinking accordingly.

What does the opposite of that do?

🧡🍻👊🏻

Vote.

Don't forget about us intelligent people who just do their own thing and dgaf about what anyone else thinks.

Glue themselves to art and culture

You were wrong

We’ll see!

People have asked for him to be released FOR-EV-ER …

IF Trump releases him it doesn’t negate the fact he didn’t his first time as president.

So … what am I wrong about?

The reality is that most (all) presidents only do what their lobbyists want. Trump didn’t have bitcoiners donating significant amounts of money and swaying votes in his first term.

You want me to agree that Trumps a whore who can be bought? We absolutely 💯 agree on that.

Ok

Yes. I even said that I may have to change my overall stance towards (against) politicians if he does. I don't want to be right on this one because I want to see Ross reunited with his family. If that means I was or am wrong about Trump, that's perfectly fine.

I certainly am. I don’t have TDS, I just think Trump is going to get rolled by the deep state once again. And, I pray that I’m wrong for Ross and Lynn’s sake.

Fair point. Holding people accountable to their claims is important. If Trump doesn’t free Ross, I’ll admit I was wrong. Can the opposing side show the same willingness to admit when they’re wrong?