What was his reasoning?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Some kind of bible code. Idk for sure but I'd bet kabbalah. He's not wrong on the code, but it doesn't hold into the NT. He also debated John Locke on the Trinity, where he insisted that the verses that support the Trinity are fake/not original.

Sounds like a wild guy.

Oh yeah... A magician, literally