author sets discovery, allows discovery

rather than the most discovery possible is what all authors and all info wants for itself

cos yea that just isnt true

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

exploring discovery further:

"how do i find what im looking for?"

how do you know when you've found it

how do you know how to know what to look for?

sure how does top results influence sense of 'found'

first 3 pages of results

how does that shape sense of foundness

how does the look of a website, a trusted logo like britannica, a known ubiquitous source like wikipedia create the idea of found

shape what found is

influence what found means

what makes a sense of having finished having found it

the answer

the end of a wikipedia article?

a tiny rabbit hole hitting links until you reach a paywall you arent paying for? as in: call to action, go get your wallet, nah fuck that

idk, all of this is really interesting

re: discovery tho

cos i think we are getting way more poor, impoverished, losing skills at discovering

at all the methods and means of discovering decades ago

like idk man you gotta wander into that alley there is a tiny record shop down this little flight of stairs allegedly if it didnt go out of business

i got a paper map, i got a phonebook, i have gas in my car can afford some wrong turns, i can try asking a waitress at the local diner? i can try the gas station guys. can try the library, the town hall, shit the fire station those guys might be hanging out and chill and might know where this old abandoned mine shaft is

participating in the discovery proactively

the perseverance it takes

the care it takes

the footwork

the cost in gas

the courage

the sense of when to be relentless, when to back off, like yo those firefighters in this town were not chill and i think i alarmed them that was a bad call

all of this stuff is skills

how successful comes down to a lot of stuff

the topic, who you are, where you are at, how you go about it, what you are able to notice, allow yourself to stumble onto

all of this is learning, takes practice, is waymaking, seeps into every other aspect of one's life to enrich it

i know shit is dire, so i dont mean to be disrespectful re: this next suggestion

as if we can afford the luxury of whimsical shit

but maybe, re: bayo akomolafe and

'the times are urgent, let us slow down'

it is kinda cool for me to picture someone taking on a journalism project that is exclusively analog

like yea this is only footwork, interviews to cassette. paper records at townhalls and libraries

i know that is so hipster and so stupid

like so trust fund

but i also am so sure as an exercise it would yield actually important shit

maybe it is meant to be a journalism assignment college class idk

but like as a reactionary force to ai and nothing is real on the internet i guess

cant trust shit

i can so see a movement of like:

i trust these irl journalists who are going this old school.

when i see that name in that newspaper, i know in this article there isnt ai misinfo. human error mistake sure, that's human. but that guy literally spends most of the day at the library of congress and just hitting the pavement knocking on doors.