The refinement of truth is through people with honest perspectives butting their perspectives against each other. Not from dishonest pretense.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Devils advocacy isn’t dishonest pretense, per se

Devil's advocacy is dishonest pretense by definition.

The "Devil" part of the phrase is standing in for a view that you, yourself, believe is wrong.

Not always

Literally by definition.

Not everything is taken literally

Speak for yourself.

That’s not a personal comment, it’s a factual comment.

1. I take things quite literally, and I speak quite literally

2. I really don't know what definition of "devil's advocacy" you are using then.

Devil's advocacy is when you take a position you do not actually hold, usually one you acknowledge is false, but which has argumentative use if you engage in the pretense of pretending it's a view you hold for the sake of argument.

It’s a form of argument used to hone an argument.

Beliefs are rarely fully formed.

This is just a retarded non-definition.

No, you’re simply stubborn