I don't get it. If I can easily keep my bitcoin in my own wallet that I control, why would I transfer custody of my holdings to some 3rd party? What value is there in doing that? While I'm not the smartest person, nor do I have millions of dollars in bitcoin, it just doesn't sound like an attractive option.
It's really that simple, Mr nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m, and you know it, but I guess the fiat-gains-chasing opportunity that #Bitcoin has provided you with has caused you to lose your ways.
Don't worry. Bitcoin will still be here, after the government confiscates your stack to fund its deficits.
Discussion
It doesn't make sense, especially for an an individual to do it.
If a large publicly traded company wants to do it, that's on them.
My main issue with nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m is about him shitting on #Bitcoin self-custody and calling the individuals who care about that "paranoid".
He could've talked about corporations keeping their #BTC with regulated custodians, without attacking the very people that got Bitcoin to the point where his company could adopt it and save itself from certain death.