Hey Nostr, what do you think? I think this is mildly infuriating.

?auto=webp&s=e31ec6b7f16a5266f7b7661cb1135617731a338e

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

One thing I like to do is to debug where did the person make a mistake in their thinking. And this one is a very juicy one πŸ˜…

Some people argue that you incure loss when you BUY something, other people subtract 100 from the wrong number (the question leads to that confusion, this is a common trick), other people are confusing profit/income/earnings (these are not well defined, but are usually used in one way) and finally there are couple folks where I'm unable to debug their form of sentience.

https://x.com/InternetH0F/status/1879581822788468766

#0 $0

#1 -$800 and a cow

#2 $200

#3 -$900 and a cow

#4 $400

How can he spend 800$ when he had 0$? Credit?

Yeah, use credit card with 0% APR for the first year πŸ™‚

assume an implicit +x on every line where x>=$900 :)

I don't get it. Can't it just be adding the $200 profit from each trade? What else are people coming up with?

It is $400, it doesn’t matter if he paid more the second time.

Its reddit.

They are retarded.

All engagement farming is infuriating. That's how it works