This is not logical brother! Using a grocery store to compare a prostitution are not the same thing! Here’s your victimless crime theory debunked 👇🏻

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/opinions/2013/3/19/prostitution-a-victimless-crime

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I argue from the first principles. If there is a good argument in the paper, please bring it here. It is not a victimless crime, it is not a crime at all! Give me a distinction between prostitution and any other work. Otherwise I can find many articles about bad labor conditions of somebody and declare all paid labor immoral.

I think you meant liberal when you said libertarian. Your argument for bad labor conditions is not the same immoral labor. There’s many good arguments in the articles. Too many to list.

Liberal has too many many meanings. But liberals in general are for state and I am against

It’s been given too many meanings and that I would agree with. Still waiting for the standard by which you make your claims?

I responded in another thread - I rely on homesteading

Having sex for money doesn't violate the NAP so how is he not speaking in alignment with libertarian principles?

First principles based by what standard?

By homesteading principle - one has private property rights to anything they homestead. The body is the first thing a person homesteads. Then comes products of their own labor. The notion of private property includes the right to exchange your property with others. Of rent it to others on some terms. And here we already have a moral case for prostitution - one exchanges some goods for "renting" somebody else's body for sex. That is prostitution based on the first principles!

Plus, the ridiculous fact that if you pay someone for sex and film it, suddenly it's legal!

Almost as if puritanical laws make no sense or something 🤣