I confirm reproducible build of #bitcoin core 28.0 on x86_64-linux-gnu.
```
sudo apt-get install guix
git clone --branch=28.x --depth=10 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
cd bitcoin/
git checkout -b my v28.0
git log # must show commit 110183746150428e6385880c79f8c5733b1361ba
env HOSTS='x86_64-linux-gnu' ./contrib/guix/guix-build
```
... wait for a while ...
```
$ sha256sum guix-build-28.0/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-28.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
7fe294b02b25b51acb8e8e0a0eb5af6bbafa7cd0c5b0e5fcbb61263104a82fbc
```
The binary with the same hash can be downloaded from https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-28.0/bitcoin-28.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
"For all you founders, CTOs, and developers out there, remember that either your code is FOSS, or you’re asking for your users’ trust. Either your code is free, or you’re running a bank, not a bitcoin company."
If it's not FOSS, it's not Bitcoin.
https://medium.com/breez-technology/if-its-not-foss-it-s-not-bitcoin-9a6bc53182e5
Sorry, the target in my message is not the current target, it is an example of target. I copy-pasted it from stack overflow:)
What you described is called target. Difficulty is the largest possible target (0x00000000FFFF0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) divided by the current target (as of right now, 0x00000000000002816E0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).
It's a tribalism. I don't want to choose between two evils. I don't consider that anyone should have a right to arrest anyone else. Self-defense - yes. Arrest - no.
What is the country?
I confirm reproducible build of LND v0.18.0 on linux-amd64 🎉 🏆
Go version: 1.22.3.
```
make release tag=v0.18.0-beta sys="linux-amd64"
d1c4b43e6fb5bb523bc72cca3f06a12aee77bcf348c2a6a7e30e9d8318df25a9 lnd-linux-amd64-v0.18.0-beta.tar.gz
```
The binary with the same hash can be downloaded from https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/releases/download/v0.18.0-beta/lnd-linux-amd64-v0.18.0-beta.tar.gz
I don't believe that an arrest is a possible and desired action between individuals of equal rights. For me it is enough that drug king can't arrest me. And I don't want to arrest him. That is true anarchy, true freedom.
The Zapatistas are organized like a popular militia. The military commanders wanted to build something more centralized in this Mexican state, but the locals did not like this idea. It does not fit well with the traditions of indigenous peoples.
What exactly is police powers? Using arms and violence for self-defence and to protect one's property and forming coalitions to do it more efficiently?
Zapatistas are a decentralized organization, rebelling against Mexico state. Kurdistan is split into 4 territories: integrated parts in Iran and Turkey, autonomous regions in Syria and Iraq. Somalia is organized into armed groups and is very well known as a stateless territory. External forces attempt to re-establish a state there, but they succeeded only in small part of the country, called Somaliland.
What will happen with the FED and the dollar? Will states remain as entities?
In present, there are peoples intentionally free from masters: Kurdistan, Zapatistas, Somalia.
Not "we". The government forced the currency on us,. making it a legal tender, demanding everyone to accept it as a payment.
Bitcoin!
Computer science, programming, Linux,
Cryptography, cyber security,
Healthy food and physical activity,
Travel and moving,
Psychology and pickup,
Foreign language,
Using Bitcoin, physical cash, exchanges,
Solving KYC and AML issues,
How to speak to officials.
Government would close such a school immediately, so people have to teach themselves 😅
In 19th century everything was called socialism. For example, Benjamin Tucker used term socialism to describe his anarchy that had free market and private property (though limited in case on land). He was almost ancap.
Where is the link?