Replying to Avatar ben

one of the main arguments for drivechains, from the author himself, is that it would anchor shitcoins onto the bitcoin network, defending bitcoin from being overtaken by some future superior chain with better features.

this argument is naive at best but feels more like fear mongering than anything else. I think Proof of Work with a fair distribution and no issuer was the real innovation here, and that’s not something you recreate today for a variety of reasons.

Bitcoin doesn’t need shitcoins, shitcoins need Bitcoin.

Avatar
idsera 2y ago

This argument is false. It's about allows new Blockchain technologies using bitcoin as currency without needing to create a shitcoins.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
RealJohnDoe 2y ago

Your #shitcoin problem is YOUR! problem. Not #Bitcoins problem..😠

Thread collapsed