If it was just a decentralized church and the doctrine was all solid, I would agree. We can have catholicity of faith without explicit communion in all cases, but a lot of these denominations don’t even believe in the real presence in the Eucharist; the center of all Christian worship. So I can’t really cosign division as a feature.

Neet is seething because he thinks everyone can be a spiritual Redditor like him, but that’s not how it works. If the hierarchy enforces something, as long as it’s not damaging the productive class, people are just going to go along with it. Animals naturally submit to hierarchy, and people are no different in this respect.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No normal person actually cares about things like the “real presence” in the Eucharist or about Trinitarianism vs Triunism and the fact that I know about any of this kind of shit at all is a sign that I have some kind of high functioning autism. Here’s what normal people actually care about:

Is my church a fag church?

Do my tithes go to sending Bibles to 60 IQ Africans?

Can my church produce aesthetic architecture?

And your church is a fag church that uses its tithes to send Bibles to 60 IQ Africans and the absolute state of American Protestant architecture isn’t good and hasn’t been for well over a century.

If you have a problem with the theology of another Christian sect then go find one of them and argue with them. This ain't a religion for intellectual weaklings.