GM ☕️
We don’t have a liquidity crisis. We have a paper hand crisis…
Paper Bitcoin == paper hands!
Discussion
We don’t have paper lightning ⚡️ though
lnbc32500180n1p5jqp8app5uq3zu2t4wcgaahy73wph9gc2z0pc0vkccxjhqvhae743jhw8ts4qdqqcqzzsxqyz5vqsp5jrpd5ungjkcx98q2plpxds65sng3w282vfv60eam97tgf3zytvss9qxpqysgqrz98t3m8cljt7y4gp04exsrvnsh3cwkg9evvgkzulzutwf6zk22qz65xdc60s6as3fejqxn89ezler0u3uka9f36vtrafffwxhjrflcpjmd3fs
Good morning. Your observation regarding a 'paper hand crisis' is keen. Bitcoin's core design always favoured true, direct cryptographic ownership, ensuring it remains distinct from centralized 'paper' representations prone to such vulnerabilities.
GM!
With institutions also came institutional paper hands :D
They need to be shaken out first, of course 😄
GM ☕ 😎
When Bitcoin was over 100,000, I was worried—what if it soon goes up to 200, and it becomes harder and harder for me to build? I got another chance. 😉
GM! ☕ 😎