āClimate change: I know itās a lie.
#Natureā
LOL
Discussion
Sorry you are an NPC, come to ignore.
Look up the definition of Ice Age
You climate change believers ask me to believe your theory that has no conclusive data, I tell you.
- Climate change has always existed, the climate has never been constant, only you say that the change that has occurred over the last 100 years is man's fault and you ignore the other part of the equation, that the climate has never been constant.
- you claim that co2 is bad, when the major explosions of life on earth have occurred with much higher concentrations of co2 in the atmosphere than now.
- You say that fossil fuels cause global warming and omit that the big problem with burning fossil fuels is cancer.
- You omit that any grade 3 volcanic eruption already contributes more to global warming than all the annual fossil fuel burning, and grade 3 volcanic eruptions occur several times a year.
- You omit the growth of the arctic ice mass.
- You never provide conclusive peer-reviewed studies, only hypotheses.
- You omit the conclusive studies where it is explained that the main factor influencing the earth's climate is the sun, obviously the sun is the main source of heat for the earth and the earth's orbit is affected by the variation of the orbits of the other planets which affects the incidence of the sun on our planet.
- You of course omit that in the end climate change is only about taxation and control.
On top of that you have a picture of climate change conferences where I deduce that you make money with it directly or indirectly.
And you expect us to believe you? Don't you realize that many people already know that you are just clowns who take advantage of the system and live off the money of others.
nostr:note1lxl3yx3w0xtgatat9nfdvmcd6w72x7303sjm5fghgcvtkpe79fwqaeqxuz
Okay Iām gonna try to answer this to the best of my abilities:
First of all: I donāt believe in climate change, I believe in maths and physics. There is enough conclusive data of 50+ years of geologists and climate scientists that supports the theory of climate change.
You may choose to ignore or reject that, but facts donāt care about your feelings.
Yes, in earths history our climate has changed consistently and in parts dramatically. Some fairly predictable changes are associated with the MilankoviÄ-Cycles (itās a periodical shift in solar radiation intensity, due to earths wobble in the solar orbit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles).
However for the last 10k years, since last Ice Age, also beginning of Human settlement and civilization, scientists call it the Holocene our climate has been fairly stable.
The earths climate system is a complex one with many variables and climate research is trying to find patterns in long time scales within that dynamic process.
CO2 is neither good nor bad, itās a molecule that contributes to the greenhouse effect. However the consequences of an ever warming planet might have drastic effects on human civilization and their infrastructure.
The planet will keep spinning long after we have made it impossible for us to inhabit it.
We both see a problem in burning fossil fuels, be it cancer or global warming, whatever it might be in the end, letās focus on fixing the underlying problem right?
Iām no expert on volcanic eruptions but a big eruption of the Pinatubo in the days before my earthly existence had actually a cooling effect since the ash cloud and some sulfuric acids were mitigating solar radiation towards our planet. (This is really basic explanation, if in doubt, consult someone with greater knowledge of chemistry with higher atmospheric layers)
All ice masses are significantly shrinking. Looking at satellite imagery might be easier to spot the differences over time, than looking at graphs with potentially misleading axis labeling.
There are top notch peer reviewed studies on the geophysical workings of climate change with the IPCC.
Please focus your time in researching this topic on groups Working Groups I and II. Especially Group I delivers what you asked for.
Sun radiation and orbits - MilankoviÄ Cycles š
Climate change is a geophysical fact. I donāt seek to mitigate it through taxation or control, but through changing our economic system from an inflationary one towards a deflationary one. (Hyperbitcoinization)
I think that most political claims on how to mitigate climate change are bullshit and I am opposed to more taxation and regulation. #Bitcoin will help fix this.
The picture was taken on a #Bitcoin conference where I made the case for #SaturdaysForSatoshi - A global freedom movement that seeks broad social change by peacefully protesting the injustice of our current monetary system in front of your local bank. I focus on the ecological implications that this change may bring, however this is FOSP (FreeOpenSourceProtest) and you may happily join with a #Bitcoin message that particularly resonates with you. (e.g. Privacy, State-Arbitrariness, Freedom)
I hope that this message reads as respectfully as I intended when writing it.
To improve discussion climate I would appreciate omitting terms like Clown or NPC.
Kind regards
A wise rabbit š°ā”ļø
A model citizen! ššļø
Usually environmentalists are the first in line to recommend more taxation, less individual freedom and insane energy policies. I choose not to burden myself with the opinion of these NPCs.
#Bitcoin however does make renewables more viable and also incentivizes less waste from fossil fuel usage.
https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2059/2023/
āClimate-changeā is a fascist anti-human ideology used to enslave you.
One question: why do you think climate models do not consider cloud coverage, even though they are obviously related to surface temperatures?
Tbh: I donāt have sufficient knowledge to answer this question properly.
Iām not sure if no models cover this, or only some that are shared a lot.
Even if, how would that change the thermodynamics of the greenhouse effect?
Every kid intuitively knows that itās warmer when thereās direct sunlight when compared to clouds. Especially in modernday cities, with lots of concrete, direct sunlight creates a lot of heat. The past decades have seen a decrease in cloud coverage in Europe alongside warming. https://climate.copernicus.eu/esotc/2022/clouds-and-sunshine-duration
Couldnāt it be that warming and clouds are related?