Who is this in reference to?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Literally any small fry, Hollywood outsider, or two bit social influencer that the media machine is using to distract from the fact that the Epstein client list has been held since late 2019.

The big fish are out there. They are not who Guy is talking about, because big fish are big because they don’t get caught.

Currently Russell Brand. The UK govt has orchestrated at the exact same instant as a 2 decade old allegation, a concerted campaign to contact and force demonetization of him on every major platform he is on.

Not an investigation, not a charge, not a conviction, nor even a terms violation on any of the platforms in question. But in the exact same instant, an accusation, a huge media push, and a govt campaign to force his removal from all platforms.

This is how police states behave.

You know what.. you can’t be deplatformed from nostr, so why not be specific. This article highlights the problems with centralized social media platforms. If this letter was sent to nostr, where would it go? Who owns a protocol? Bitcoin and Nostr etc have a high level of pushback because they are freedom incarnate.

I don’t know if Brand did this stuff. The timing seems odd but whatever. Zoom out. Should some government exert business influence over a private company in a whole other country? No. This is why we told King George to shove it.

Should someone in a far away place have the ability to remove your income when you haven’t even been convicted of a crime. No. Blackstone’s formulation was born out of thousands of years of us attempting to become civilized.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2023/09/21/rumble-slams-disturbing-request-from-uk-government-over-russell-brands-content/?sh=1614ff457474