I’d prefer 3 but obviously it depends on the cost. I use tarsnap and I like how they charge, you deposit money and your balance goes down a tiny bit every second.

Better than having to pay per image or whatever.

Might be hard to run since, unlike a relay, you’ll have to figure out some kind of moderation for “bad” images.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

great idea maybe we could pay with sats like sn for hosting our content

Yeah, content moderation is no easy task with many users. That's why I would lean more to option 1 or 2.

damus will be implementing 3 but it will be free

I was thinking that moderation is really the right place to integrate payments (upvote ranking should be pow imo).

Pay to post and pay to report. If a report is legit poster’s money goes to reporter, if report is bogus reporter’s money goes to moderator.

Good idea, might actually work!

I also lean towards 1 or 2, preferably at the option of the user