its not "Tor for money"
not until its tested and proven itself.
stop trying to sell it as production ready.
Paxful took possession of user funds.
a clearnet central point of failure with good UX and volume.
disingenuous.
again.
yeah, robotsats and bisq operators *could* become targets with more adoption.
but the cost/benefit for LE is NOT equivalent to (what the rest of the world except for you refer to as) DNMs.
Goalposts are cheap on Amazon.
he says Paxful is a DNM that got busted
and you think *I'm the one moving goal posts?
No he didn't, but it shows how subpar the current state of your reading comprehension is.
He said paxful case is a precedent on why they'd go after all p2p exchanges - which he equated to the risk profile.
Amazon.com
and its a big fucking leap
as i explained.
your "explanation" was basically "well bisq isn't very big yet so they aren't at risk"
which is, at least in my opinion, a very silly thing to say
you have to start using good privacy when you're small so that it protects you when you grow big
hence tor + LN
what is said is
the cost/benefit for LE is insufficient.
and makes it a very different thing than an *actual DNM*
