Nice! nostr:nprofile1qqs8qy3p9qnnhhq847d7wujl5hztcr7pg6rxhmpc63pkphztcmxp3wgpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgmwaehxw309a6xsetxdaex2um59ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hsz9nhwden5te0dehhxarjv4kxjar9wvhx7un89uqaujaz nostr:nprofile1qqs06gywary09qmcp2249ztwfq3ue8wxhl2yyp3c39thzp55plvj0sgprfmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdakszxmhwden5te0w35x2cmfw3skgetv9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5q3camnwvaz7tmgda68y6t8dp6xummh9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5ahp0n0 nostr:nprofile1qqswnzd2dcqn04f2gy8vmzdwt8m6m0ashhkf0p4erqwrwpu4fdx056gpz4mhxue69uhks6tnwshxummnw3ezumrpdejqzxthwden5te0wpuhyctdd9jzuenfv96x5ctx9e3k7mgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqaw47y3, if the problem wasn't already solved by incentives, this takes care of that - and generalizes by aggregating across multiple relays.
Discussion
nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z bringing the heat, again, as per usual.
Devs might consider limiting the usage of "entire dataset" "entire network" because it can be confusing or misleading. To me it translates to "large subset of the network", but that's not universal.
Its actually quite rare that we ever have complete access to complete knowledge of the system. Nostr is aligned with reality in that sense. Follower counts should always have an asterisk with "within this social system" stamped on there for anything that uses follower counts. Its perfectly fine to have a partial view of the entire network. Responding to nostr:nprofile1qqsdulkdrc5hdf4dktl6taxmsxnasykghdnf32sqmnc7w6km2hhav3gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytfsxyhxymmvwshx7cnnv4e8vetj9uq3uamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwp6kytnhv4kxcmmjv3jhytnwv46z7qmml2f
Makes sense
